AI continuing education with a provable result
AI continuing education with its own case per role, from sales to accounting, instead of one generic AI overview for everyone.
Book a Discovery Call
Continuing education is meant to move a role forward, not just fill the calendar. This AI continuing education starts exactly there, at the role. Sales trains on a sales case, HR on an HR case, the business unit on its own process. The result is an outcome that visibly strengthens the role, plus a documented record. We plan scope, challenges, roles, data, tool access and schedule together so your continuing education can be ready to start within a week.
AI continuing education is a qualification alongside the job that adapts existing competence to new AI tools. At Corporathon, this happens by role, on a real case of the respective function, so the result is a provable outcome and a documented competence record, instead of an attendance slip with no link to your own task.
The problem this continuing education solves
Many continuing education programmes treat everyone the same, even though roles have completely different AI cases. A generic programme then really reaches nobody. Four points stay unresolved.
- No link to the role. A general AI overview helps sales as little as accounting, because both need something different.
- No career effect. Continuing education is meant to strengthen the role. An attendance slip does not do that.
- No transfer. Without a case from your own function, what is learned stays abstract.
- No record for the personnel file. A slip proves attendance, not a grown skill.
Corporathon trains every role on its own case. The result is tailored to the function and therefore effective in the job immediately.
What the continuing education covers, specifically
This is not a developer course. It is guided, role-based continuing education for business teams who cannot code and do not need to. Participants work with Cursor, Lovable, n8n, Gamma, Figma Make, Claude Code and custom GPTs on their own data. Every role gets a case from its function.
A run has four building blocks that build on each other:
- 1Role-based challenge scoping. The continuing-education goal becomes a real case of the function with a named user and a desired output, for example for sales "turn call notes automatically into a structured opportunity summary".
- 2Tool workshop. Each role learns exactly the tools its case needs.
- 3Build phase. The teams build with guidance. We sit alongside, unblock issues and show the next step.
- 4Pitch, evidence and handoff. Each role shows its result, hands it to an owner, and the continuing-education record carries real hands-on relevance.
Benefits and goals
The goal is continuing education that moves the role forward and can prove it.
- A role-based result that visibly strengthens the function.
- A working artefact that belongs to you and keeps running, instead of a slip.
- A record that fits the personnel file and proves a grown skill.
- A documented AI competence measure as a building block for Article 4 of the EU AI Act.
Who it fits, and who it does not
| Good fit when | Not the best fit when |
|---|---|
| every role should train on its own case | a generic AI overview for everyone is enough |
| continuing education should deliver a provable result | a plain attendance slip is enough |
| data and tool access can generally be approved | real data must never be touched for legal reasons under any circumstances |
| the grown skill should be documented in the personnel file | no documentation is wanted |
Services and deliverables
- Upfront scoping with role-based challenge scope per group.
- A curated tool stack per role, including access.
- A facilitated build sprint with guidance throughout.
- At least one working prototype per role or team.
- A handoff document per prototype with owner, access, open risks and next step.
- A continuing-education record with hands-on relevance and a documented competence measure per participant.
The No-Code Development with Lovable programme produces a published app over two days, from the first requirement to handover, with a capstone task and certificate.
Formats as offer cards
Spark
- What you get: 1 day, a role-based case, tool workshop, handoff document, continuing-education record with hands-on relevance.
- You work with: one Corporathon facilitator, the right stack for one role.
- Ideal for: up to 10 participants, a function that wants targeted continuing education.
- Your investment: on request.
Ignite (recommended)
- What you get: 2 days, several roles in parallel, several prototypes, continuing-education records, broader impact across functions.
- You work with: several facilitators, a curated stack per role.
- Ideal for: 10 to 15 participants, several functions training together.
- Your investment: on request.
Blaze
- What you get: 3 to 5 days, several teams, deeper prototypes, continuing-education records with a clear implementation path.
- You work with: a facilitator team, the full tool stack, an optional link to an implementation sprint.
- Ideal for: 15+ participants, several departments with a company-wide continuing-education plan.
- Your investment: on request.
Teams from Adobe, YOYABA, Onventis and NavVis have worked with us. Prices on request for now; the scope depends on team size, number of roles and depth of handoff.
AI continuing education vs. generic training
| Criterion | Generic training | Corporathon AI continuing education |
|---|---|---|
| Link | an overview for everyone | role-based on a real case |
| Result | attendance slip | a provable, role-strengthening result |
| Career effect | low | a grown skill in the role |
| Evidence | attendance | a continuing-education record with hands-on relevance |
| Proof of ROI | hardly provable | a tangible artefact as the starting point for your own measurement |
| Time to first result | weeks to months | ready to start in 1 week, result depending on scope |
The table compares ways of working, not providers, and deliberately contains no invented percentages.
How the continuing education can pay off (a model, not a customer figure)
Role-based continuing education works where the result fits exactly the function's task. The model has three inputs: time per week for a role-specific task, the share the built prototype takes off, and internal hourly rate times the number of people in the role affected. Formula: *hours saved per week × hourly rate × 45 weeks × people − one-off cost*. A worked example as a model. If the task in sales costs five hours per person per week and the prototype takes off two fifths of that, that is two hours per person. At a rate of 60 euros and six people, that is 2 × 60 × 45 × 6, so 32,400 euros a year in freed-up capacity within the role. We do the real calculation in the discovery call.
Interactive role case catalogue: /en/ki-fortbildung/tools/rollen-faelle/.
Social proof
Teams from Adobe, YOYABA, Onventis and NavVis have worked with us. We show their names and logos as references and, where approved, workshop photos and public feedback. We deliberately publish concrete figures only once the source, method and period are documented and approved. Everything at /en/case-studies.
The process as an animated timeline, in 1 week
| # | Step | Owner | Output |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Intro call | Corporathon + sponsor | clarified upskilling goal, rough scope, date |
| 2 | Tools and challenges call | Corporathon + team leads | role-based challenges, tool choice per role |
| 3 | Finalising information and data | Client (IT, data protection) | approved data access, documented limits |
| 4 | Hackathon preparation | Corporathon | prepared environments, access, schedule |
| 5 | Tool workshop | Corporathon + teams | roles can operate their stack |
| 6 | Hackathon sprint | Teams (guided) | working prototypes |
| 7 | Result pitches and handoff | Teams + owner | results, handoff documents, continuing-education records |
Your Corporathon, in just 1 week.
30-minute discovery call: clarify the need, pick a challenge, set the schedule.
The calendar is embedded via Cal.com and only loads external content once you ask for it.
Frequently asked questions
Short answers to the questions that come up most before booking.
The term is secondary, the link to the role is what counts. This continuing education is built role by role. Every function works on its own case, so the result strengthens exactly that role, instead of giving everyone the same abstract knowledge.
Yes. Ignite and Blaze run with several roles in parallel, each on its own case. That produces several role-based prototypes in one run.
No. Business teams build with AI tools without classic programming. We choose the stack so the role's case is solvable without prior knowledge.
Yes. Every participant receives a continuing-education record with hands-on relevance and a documented competence measure, suitable for the personnel file.
We clarify data access and limits with your IT and data protection team before the start. Only what is approved gets used, and the limits are documented.
It can document a practical AI competence measure and so contribute to Article 4. It is not an official certificate and does not guarantee automatic compliance.